分类回收费用承担模式对回收渠道影响及协调机制研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0881

Abstract

Abstract:

Classified recycling is an important way to improve the efficiency of resource utilization， but the recycling channel will be affected by the cost-bearing modes of classified recycling. To analyze the impact of classified recycling costs on recycling channels， a game model of decentralized and centralized decision-making involving a recycler and a processor is constructed based on different cost-bearing modes of classified recycling. The main findings of the research are：（1）Classified recycling can increase the revenue of both the recycler and the processor， but only when consumers' sensitivity to the price of waste products is less than a certain threshold， the recycler and the processor are willing to carry out classified recycling；（2）When decentralized decision-making， both the processor and the recycler are responsible for the classified recycling costs better than only one of them is responsible for the classified recycling costs； when the centralized decision is made， the classified recycling effort， the number of waste products recycled， and the revenue of the recycling channel are better than the situation when the decentralized decision is made；（3） Designing a coordination mechanism based on Nash bargaining cost sharing contract is beneficial to increase the revenue of the processor and the recycling channel， but the revenue of the recycler is damaged in this contract model；（4） The two-part tariff contract and revenue-sharing contract， by reallocating equilibrium profits of the recycling channel under the Nash bargaining cost-sharing contract model， can increase the profits of the recycler and the processor when the ratio of fixed fees promised by the processor to the recycler and the profit sharing is within a certain range. This results in Pareto improvement in the supply chain. However， the overall profit of the recycling channel does not reach the level of centralized decision-making；（5） The revenue-sharing-cost-sharing contract not only increases the profits of of the recycler and the processor but also achieves centralized decision-making of overall profit in the recycling channel， thereby achieving supply chain coordination.

Key words: classified recycling, recycling channels, coordination mechanism, game theory

CLC Number:

F272

Xi-qiang XIA,Meng-yuan LU,Biao Chen,Rui Wu. Research on the Impact of the Classification Recycling Expenses Bearing Mode on the Recovery Channels and the Coordination Mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(12): 228-239.

Figures/Tables 9

符号	$i = N$	$i = D$	$i = R$	$i = G$	$i = C$
$τ D i *$	$— —$	$δ (α A + Q) 4 k - α δ 2$	$— —$	$2 δ (α A + Q) 8 k - 3 α δ 2$	$δ (α A + Q) 2 k - α δ 2$
$τ R i *$	$— —$	$— —$	$δ (α A + Q) 8 k - α δ 2$	$δ (α A + Q) 8 k - 3 α δ 2$	$δ (α A + Q) 2 k - α δ 2$
$w i *$	$α A - Q 2 α$	$2 k (α A - Q) + α δ 2 Q α (4 k - α δ 2)$	$4 k (α A - Q) + α δ 2 Q α (8 k - α δ 2)$	$4 k (α A - Q) + 3 α δ 2 Q α (8 k - 3 α δ 2)$	$— —$
$p i *$	$α A - 3 Q 4 α$	$k (α A - 3 Q) + α δ 2 Q α (4 k - α δ 2)$	$2 k (α A - 3 Q) + α δ 2 Q α (8 k - α δ 2)$	$2 k (α A - 3 Q) + 3 α δ 2 Q α (8 k - 3 α δ 2)$	$k (α A - Q) + α δ 2 Q α (2 k - α δ 2)$
$q i *$	$α A + Q 4$	$k (α A + Q) 4 k - α δ 2$	$2 k (α A + Q) 8 k - α δ 2$	$2 k (α A + Q) 8 k - 3 α δ 2$	$k (α A + Q) 2 k - α δ 2$
$π D i *$	$(α A + Q) 2 8 α$	$k (α A + Q) 2 2 α (4 k - α δ 2)$	$8 k 2 (α A + Q) 2 α (8 k - α δ 2) 2$	$2 k (4 k - α δ 2) (α A + Q) 2 α (8 k - 3 α δ 2) 2$	$— —$
$π R i *$	$(α A + Q) 2 16 α$	$k 2 (α A + Q) 2 α (4 k - α δ 2) 2$	$k (α A + Q) 2 2 α (8 k - α δ 2)$	$k (8 k - α δ 2) (α A + Q) 2 2 α (8 k - 3 α δ 2) 2$	$— —$
$π C *$	$— —$	$— —$	$— —$	$— —$	$k (α A + Q) 2 α (2 k - α δ 2)$

符号	$k = 60 δ = 0.6$	$k = 100 δ = 0.7$	$k = 150 δ = 0.8$
$w D *$	2944.2	2989.1	2986.2
$w R *$	2980.4	2977.9	2976.4
$w G *$	3008.2	3000.5	2996.1
$π D D *$	27854019.5	27807720.1	27781132.6
$π D R *$	27853450.4	27807341.7	27780846.3
$π D G *$	28108715.8	28014769.3	27960945.3
$π R D *$	14053491.2	14006810.1	13980038.5
$π R R *$	13864054.9	13852574.9	13845973.8
$π R G *$	14118176.9	14059242.9	14025498.3
$π C *$	112437203.0	112060624.5	111844948.7

符号	$k = 60 δ = 0.6$	$k = 100 δ = 0.7$	$k = 150 δ = 0.8$
$μ *$	0.7133	0.7135	0.7136
$w B *$	3015.0	3006.1	3000.9
$π D B *$	29104120.2	28963005.5	28848823.9
$π R B *$	14021772.5	13981006.2	13957619.8
$π C B *$	43125892.7	42944011.7	42806443.7

符号	$k = 60, δ = 0.6$	$k = 100, δ = 0.7$	$k = 150, δ = 0.8$
$F$	[96404.4, 995404.2]	[78236.7, 948236.2]	[67878.5, 887878.6]
$π D B * - F$	[28108715.8, 29007715.8]	[28014769.3, 28884768.8]	[27960945.3, 28780945.4]
$π R B * + F$	[14118176.9, 15017176.7]	[14059242.9, 14929242.4]	[14025498.3, 14845498.4]
$θ$	[0.6518, 0.6726]	[0.6524, 0.6726]	[0.6532, 0.6724]
$θ π C B *$	[28109456.9, 29006475.4]	[28016673.2, 28884142.3]	[27961169.0, 28783052.7]
$(1 - θ) π C B *$	[14119417.3, 15016435.8]	[14059869.4, 14927338.5]	[14023391.0, 14845274.7]

符号	$k = 60 δ = 0.6$	$k = 100 δ = 0.7$	$k = 150 δ = 0.8$
$μ * ˉ$	0.5	0.5	0.5
$w R * ˉ$	4566.1	4550.7	4541.9
$π D B * ˉ$	56218601.5	56030312.25	55922474.35
$π R B * ˉ$	56218601.5	56030312.25	55922474.35
$π C B * ˉ$	112437203.0	112060624.5	111844948.7

References 31

1	Kasulaitis B V， Babbitt C W， Krock A K. Dematerialization and the circular economy： comparing strategies to reduce material impacts of the consumer electronic product ecosystem［J］. Journal of Industrial Ecology， 2019， 23（1）： 119-132.
2	汪明月，李颖明，史文强，等.不同环境规制下企业废旧产品回收的动态决策研究［J］.系统工程理论与实践，2020，40（1）：103-118.
	Wang Mingyue， Li Yingming， Shi Wenqiang， et al. Research on dynamic decision-making of enterprise waste product recycling under different environmental regulations［J］. System Engineering-Theory & Practice，2020，40（1）：103-118.
3	Jo C H， Myung S T. Efficient recycling of valuable resources from discarded lithium ion batteries［J］. Journal of Power Sources， 2019， 426（11）： 259-265.
4	Zhang Wenxuan， Xu Chengjian， He Wenzhi， et al. A review on management of spent lithiumon batteries and strategy for resource recycling of all components from them［J］. Waste Management & Research， 2018， 36（2）： 99-112.
5	王玉燕，梁佳平，申亮，等.电商平台公平关切下低碳E-CLSC的决策研究［J］.中国管理科学，2021，29（4）：115-125.
	Wang Yuyan， Liang Jiaping， Shen Liang， et al. Research on the decision-making of low-carbon E-CLSC under the fair concern of e-commerce platform［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2021，29（4）：115-125.
6	Ilankoon I， Ghorbani Y， Chong Mengnan， et al. E-waste in the international context：a review of trade flows， regulations， hazards， waste management strategies and technologies for value recovery［J］. Waste Management， 2018， 82（10）： 258-275.
7	王文宾，王智慧，杨斯奇，等.制造商竞争下闭环供应链的押金返还制度研究［J］.中国管理科学，2021，29（6）：179-188.
	Wang Wenbin， Wang Zhihui， Yang Siqi， et al. Research on the deposit return system of closed-loop supply chain under manufacturer competition［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2021，29（6）：179-188.
8	Cui Hailong， Sosic G. Recycling common materials： effectiveness， optimal decisions， and coordination mechanisms［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2019， 274（3）： 1055-1068.
9	赵强，夏西强.回收宣传模式对废旧产品回收影响及协调机制研究［J］.中国管理科学，2022，30（3）：258-268.
	Zhao Qiang， Xia Xiqiang. Research on the influence of recycling propaganda model on the recycling of waste products and the coordination mechanism［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2022， 30（3）：258-268
10	李增禄，郭强，聂佳佳.回收商回收再售策略研究：在线回收VS传统回收［J］.工业工程与管理，2019，24（6）：164-172.
	Li Zenglu， Guo Qiang， Nie Jiajia. Research on recycling and resale strategy of recyclers： online recycling VS traditional recycling［J］. Industrial Engineering and Management， 2019， 24（6）：164-172.
11	冯林玉，秦鹏.生活垃圾分类的实践困境与义务进路［J］.中国人口•资源与环境，2019，29（5）：118-126.
	Feng Linyu， Qin Peng. The practical dilemma and obligation approach of household garbage classification［J］. China Population， Resources and Environment， 2019， 29（5）：118-126.
12	邵志国，李梦笛，韩传峰，等.基于演化博弈的建筑垃圾处理协同机制及仿真［J］.中国管理科学，2022， DOI：10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1728 . doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1728
	Shao Zhiguo， Li Mengdi， Han Chuanfeng，et al. Simulation and collaborative mechanism of construction waste disposal based on evolutionary game［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2022， DOI：10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1728 . doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1728
13	Wang Nengmin， He Qidong， Jiang Bin. Hybrid closed-loop supply chains with competition in recycling and product markets［J］. International Journal of Production Economics， 2019， 217（6）： 246-258.
14	He Qidong， Wang Nengmin， Yang Zhen， et al. Competitive collection under channel inconvenience in closed-loop supply chain［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2019， 275（1）： 155-166.
15	蒋琼，王勇，刘名武.新兴智能回收下制造商转移定价决策［J］.中国管理科学，2021，29（9）：156-167.
	Jiang Qiong， Wang Yong， Liu Mingwu. The transfer pricing decision of manufacturers under the emerging intelligent recycling［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2021，29（9）：156-167.
16	Feng Lipan， Govindan K， Li Chunfa. Strategic planning： design and coordination for dual-recycling channel reverse supply chain considering consumer behavior［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2017， 260（2）： 601-612.
17	Chen Juhong， Wu Di， Li Peng. Research on the pricing model of the dual-channel reverse supply chain considering logistics costs and consumers' awareness of sustainability based on regional differences［J］. Sustainability， 2018， 10（7）：2229.
18	Kang Yao， Chen Juhong， Wu Di. Research on pricing and service level strategies of dual channel reverse supply chain considering consumer preference in multi-regional situations［J］. International Journal of Environmental Research And Public Health， 2020， 17（23）： 9143.
19	Li Chunfa， Feng Lipan， Luo Suyuan. Strategic introduction of an online recycling channel in the reverse supply chain with a random demand［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2019， 236（22）： 117683.
20	Fortuna L M， Diyamandoglu V. Optimization of greenhouse gas emissions in second-hand consumer product recovery through reuse platforms［J］. Waste Management， 2017， 245（66）： 178-189.
21	郑本荣，杨超，杨珺.回收渠道竞争下制造商的战略联盟策略选择［J］.系统工程理论与实践，2018，38（6）：1479-1491.
	Zheng Benrong， Yang Chao， Yang Jun. The strategic alliance strategy selection of manufacturers under the competition of recycling channels［J］. System Engineering - Theory & Practice，2018，38（6）：1479-1491.
22	王文宾，张梦，赵蕾，等.第三方回收商公平关切下闭环供应链决策模型［J］.系统工程学报，2019，34（3）：409-421.
	Wang Wenbin， Zhang Meng， Zhao Lei， et al. Decision-making model of closed-loop supply chain based on third-party collector’s fairness concern［J］. Journal of Systems Engineering， 2019， 34（3）：409-421.
23	王玉燕，苏梅，申亮，等.电商闭环供应链中的“让利”公平关切回收决策研究［J］.中国管理科学，2020，28（12）：87-97.
	Wang Yuyan， Su Mei， Shen Liang， et al. Research decision of altryisitic fairness concern on e-commerce closed-loop supply chain ［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2020， 28（12）： 87-97.
24	郑本荣，杨超，刘丛.成本分摊对制造商回收闭环供应链的影响［J］.系统工程理论与实践，2017，37（9）：2344-2354.
	Zheng Benrong， Yang Chao， Liu Cong. The impact of cost sharing on manufacturers' recycling closed-loop supply chain［J］. System Engineering - Theory & Practice，2017，37（9）：2344-2354.
25	郑小雪，刘志，李登峰，等.基于多选择目标规划方法的生产者责任组织成本分摊合作博弈研究［J］.系统工程理论与实践，2021，41（10）：2512-2523.
	Zheng Xiaoxue， Liu Zhi， Li Dengfeng， et al. Research on cooperative game for cost sharing of producer responsibility organization based on multi-choice goal programming method［J］. System Engineering - Theory & Practice， 2021， 41（10）： 2512-2523.
26	李飚，夏西强，赵强.博弈视角下分类回收对废旧产品回收影响研究［J］.中国管理科学，2023，31（8）：261-268.
	Li Biao， Xia Xiqiang， Zhao Qiang. Study on the impact of classified recycling on the recycling of waste products from the perspective of game ［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2023， 31（8）：261-268.
27	王伟，葛新权，徐颖.城市垃圾分类回收多元主体利益博弈与差别责任分析［J］.中国人口•资源与环境，2017，27（S2）：41-44.
	Wang Wei， Ge Xinquan， Xu Ying. Multi-subject game interests and differential responsibility analysis of urban waste recycling［J］. China Population， Resources and Environment， 2017， 27（S2）：41-44.
28	Li Hong， Chen Wenjuan. Research on reverse supply chain under O2O classified recovery mode［J］. Journal of Physics：Conference Series，2020， 1549（12）： 6-10.
29	王文宾，丁军飞，王智慧，等.回收责任分担视角下零售商主导闭环供应链的政府奖惩机制研究［J］.中国管理科学，2019，27（7）：127-136.
	Wang Wenbin， Ding Junfei， Wang Zhihui， et al. Reward-penalty mechanism of government for retailer-led closed-loop supply chain under collection responsibility sharing［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2019， 27（7）：127-136.
30	王玉燕，申亮，韩强，等.考虑产品质量和利他偏好关切的电商供应链模型研究［J］.中国管理科学，2021，29（9）：123-134.
	Wang Yuyan， Shen Liang， Han Qiang， et al. E-commerce supply chain model considering product quality and altruistic preference concern［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2021， 29（9）： 123-134.
31	巫瑞，夏西强，黄兆涵.政府奖惩机制对废旧产品行业分类回收影响及协调机制研究［J］.工业技术经济，2023，42（7）：143-152.
	Wu Rui， Xia Xiqiang， Huang Zhaohan. Research on the impact ofgovernment incentives and penalties on the classified recycling of waste products industry and the coordination mechanism［J］.Journal of Industrial Technological Economics， 2023，42（7）：143-152.

[1]	Qiang Chen,Junmei Rong,Xuhua Chang,Lei Gong. Scientific Research Assessment and Patent Examination Strategies of University Considering Differencesin Reward and Punishment [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(9): 313-322.
[2]	Yuelong Zheng,Chunguang Bai,Dengfeng Li. Research on the Supply Decision of Industrial General Purpose Technologies Considering Market-oriented Development [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(8): 127-138.
[3]	Biao Li,Xiqiang Xia,Qiuyue Li. Research on the Influence of Carbon Trading on Carbon Emission Reduction Effect and Coordination Mechanism under Carbon Quotas [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(8): 250-260.
[4]	Xusheng Yao,Shoufeng Ma,Shunqiang Ye,Shuai Ling. Yield or Go?Evolutionary Game Analysis of Pedestrian and Autonomous Vehicle Conflicts [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(7): 138-149.
[5]	Jiangtao Hong,Yuting Quan. Closed-loop Supply Chain Decision Model Based on Trade-in and Supply Chain Structural Differences [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 147-157.
[6]	Yongwei Cheng. Cooperation Modes and Decision Optimization in Live Streaming Commerce [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 297-306.
[7]	Lili Ding,Zhimeng Guo,Yu Bai,Ping Wang. Impact Analysis of Fairness Preference on Industrial Development of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Projects [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(4): 187-197.
[8]	Qin Su,Wenbo Zhang. Supply Chain Quality Information Sharing and Block Chain-enabled Authorization Strategies [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(3): 324-334.
[9]	Xuefeng Zhang,Guo LI. Opening-Up or Laissez-Faire? Research on Strategies of Retail Platform to Deal with Manufacturer Encroachment [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(1): 251-259.
[10]	Ruo-zhen QIU,Xiao-jing CHU,Yue SUN. Dual-channel Supply Chain Decision Model Based on Robust Optimizationunder Price and Delivery-time Dependent Demand [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(9): 114-126.
[11]	Meng TONG,Wei LI. Decision on Dual-channel Supply Chain Based on 3D Printing Technology Affecting Cost and Demand [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(8): 142-150.
[12]	LI Biao, XIA Xi-qiang, ZHAO Qiang. Study on the Impact of Classified Recycling on the Recycling of Waste Products from The Perspective of Game Theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(8): 261-268.
[13]	CHEN Ke-bing, KONG Ying-qi, LEI Dong. Pricing and Green Input Decisions of a Competitive Supply Chain with Consumers’ Product Preference and Different Channel Powers [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(5): 1-10.
[14]	HAN Meng-yuan, FENG Liang-qing, ZHANG Lei. The Impact of Triple Competition in the Green Supply Chain on the Issuance of Substitutable Products [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(4): 89-100.
[15]	LI Zhong-ping, WANG Jian-jun. High-Quality Service Capacity Reallocation Decision and Profit-Sharing Coordination Scheme Design in the Hierarchical Healthcare Systems [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(4): 205-217.

Research on the Impact of the Classification Recycling Expenses Bearing Mode on the Recovery Channels and the Coordination Mechanism

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 31

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0