社会网络环境下基于行为管理的大群体共识决策方法

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.1053

Abstract

Abstract:

A behavior management based consensus method for large-scale group decision-making is proposed to address potential non-cooperative behaviors， strategic manipulation behaviors， and delegation behaviors that may occur during the consensus reaching process of large-scale group decision-making under social network environments. Firstly， the directed Louvain method in social network analysis is introduced to divide decision-makers into subgroups within overlapping communities based on the directed social network， based on which subgroup members and subgroups are weighted based on social relationships and preference similarity. Subsequently， during the process of consensus reaching， by introducing the non-cooperative behavior identification and management methods based on the uninorm operator， identification and management mechanisms are designed for strategic manipulation behaviors based on the types of behaviors and social network analysis. A social relationship based management mechanism is also proposed for delegation behaviors， after which the consensus method for large-scale group decision-making based on behavior management is completed. Finally， a numerical example， simulation experiments and comparative analysis are conducted to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Key words: social network analysis, large-scale group decision-making, consensus reaching, behavior management

CLC Number:

C934

Ruxin Nie,Zhangpeng Tian,Heming Liang. A Consensus Method for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Based on Behavior Management under Social Network Environments[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(9): 35-47.

Figures/Tables 7

子群	子群成员
$G 1$	e₁，e₂，e₃，e₄，e₅，e₆，e₇，e₉
$G 2$	e₈，e₂₀，e₂₁，e₂₂，e₂₃，e₂₄，e₂₅
$G 3$	e₁₀，e₁₁，e₁₂，e₁₃，e₁₄，e₁₅，e₁₆，e₁₇，e₁₈，e₁₉

子群	$I C L k$	$O C L k$	$A T S k$	$S u b k$	$ω ˉ k$
$G 1$	0.3182	0.3356	0.0232	0.3200	0.3091
$G 2$	0.2883	0.3308	0.0259	0.2800	0.2569
$G 3$	0.3935	0.3336	0.0402	0.400	0.4340

References 32

1	张发明，韩江涛，张淋茜，等. 社会信任网络下基于T2PLD算子的多属性大群体决策方法［J/OL］. 中国管理科学，2023， .
	Zhang F M， Han J T， Zhang L X， et al. Multi-attribute large group decision making method based on T2PLD operator in social trust network［J/OL］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2023， .
2	Gai T T， Cao M S， Chiclana F， et al. Consensus-trust driven bidirectional feedback mechanism for improving consensus in social network large-group decision making ［J］. Group Decision and Negotiation， 2023， 32（1）： 45-74.
3	Wu J， Chiclana F. A social network analysis trust–consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations ［J］. Knowledge-Based Systems， 2014， 59： 97-107.
4	王伟明，徐海燕，朱建军. 区间信息下的大规模群体DEMATEL决策方法［J］. 系统工程理论与实践， 2021， 41（6）： 1585-1597.
	Wang W M， Xu H Y， Zhu J J. Large-scale group DEMATEL decision making method under interval information［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice， 2021， 41（6）： 1585-1597.
5	张发明，朱姝琪. 社会网络环境下基于群体一致性的概率语言多属性大群体决策方法［J］. 系统管理学报， 2022， 31（4）： 679-688.
	Zhang F M， Zhu S Q. Probabilistic language multi-attribute large group decision-making method based on group consistency in social network analysis［J］. Journal of Systems & Management， 2022， 31（4）： 679- 688.
6	卢艳玲，许叶军，李梦琪. 社会网络环境下基于负面行为管理与改进的最小成本共识模型的大群体决策方法［J］. 控制与决策， 2024， 39（1）： 327-335.
	Lu Y L， Xu Y J， Li M Q. Large-scale group decision-making method based on negative behavior management and improved minimum cost consensus model in social network environment［J］. Control and Decision， 2024， 39（1）： 327-335.
7	Sun Q， Wu J， Chiclana F， et al. An approach to prevent weight manipulation by minimum adjustment and maximum entropy method in social network group decision making［J］. Artificial Intelligence Review， 2023， 56（7）： 7315-7346.
8	Ding R X， Palomares I， Wang X Q， et al. Large-scale decision-making： Characterization， taxonomy， challenges and future directions from an Artificial Intelligence and applications perspective［J］. Information Fusion， 2020， 59： 84-102.
9	Tang M， Liao H C. From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making： What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era？ A state-of-the-art survey［J］. Omega， 2019， 100： 102141.
10	Tang M， Liao H C， Hamido F. Delegation mechanism： Based large-scale group decision making with heterogeneous experts and overlapping communities［J］. IEEE Transactions on Systems， Man， and Cybernetics： Systems， 2021， 52（6）： 3542-3555.
11	Xiao F， Chen Z Y， Wang X K， et al. Managing minority opinions in risk evaluation by a delegation mechanism-based large-scale group decision-making with overlapping communities［J］. Journal of the Operational Research Society， 2022， 73（10）： 2338-2357.
12	Gao Y， Zhang Z. Consensus reaching with non-cooperative behavior management for personalized individual semantics-based social network group decision making［J］. Journal of the Operational Research Society， 2022， 73（11）： 2518-2535.
13	Tian Z P， Nie R X， Wang J Q， et al. Adaptive consensus-based model for heterogeneous large-scale group decision making： Detecting and managing non-cooperative behaviors［J］. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems， 2021， 29： 2209-2223.
14	Dong Y C， Zhang H J， Herrera-Viedma E. Integrating experts' weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors［J］. Decision Support Systems， 2016， 84： 1-15.
15	Yang G R， Wang X Q， Ding R X， et al. Managing non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making based on trust relationships and confidence levels of decision makers［J］. Information Fusion， 2023， 97： 101820.
16	Liu Y T， Wu S Q， Li C C， et al. Exploring 2-rank strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making and its applications in project review and university ranking［J］. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence， 2023， 117： 105525.
17	Liu Y T， Li Y， Liang H M， et al. Strategic experts' weight manipulation in 2-rank consensus reaching in group decision making［J］. Expert Systems with Applications， 2023， 216： 119432.
18	Yager R R. Defending against strategic manipulation in uninorm： Based multi-agent decision making［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2002， 141（1）： 217-232.
19	Dong Y C， Liu Y T， Liang H M， et al. Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making［J］. Omega， 2018， 75： 154-164.
20	Liu Y T， Dong Y C， Liang H M， et al. Multiple attribute strategic weight manipulation with minimum cost in a group decision making context with interval attribute weights information［J］. IEEE Transactions on Systems， Man， and Cybernetics： Systems， 2019， 49（10）： 1981-1992.
21	Li S L， Rodríguez R M， Wei C P. Managing manipulative and non-cooperative behaviors in large scale group decision making based on a WeChat-like interaction network［J］. Information Fusion， 2021， 75： 1-15.
22	Wu J， Cao M S， Chiclana F， et al. An optimal feedback model to prevent manipulation behavior in consensus under social network group decision making［J］. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems， 2021， 29（7）： 1750-1763.
23	Liu Z M， Wang W X， Liu P D. Dynamic consensus of large group emergency decision-making under dual-trust relationship： Based social network［J］. Information Sciences， 2022， 615： 58-89.
24	Xu X H， Zhong X Y， Chen X H， et al. A dynamical consensus method based on exit-delegation mechanism for large group emergency decision making［J］. Knowledge-Based Systems， 2015， 86： 237-249.
25	Li Z L， Zhang Z， Yu W Y. Consensus reaching with consistency control in group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering，2022，170： 108311.
26	李胜利，魏翠萍，宋燕红. 基于信任关系和互补判断矩阵的群决策方法［J］. 控制与决策， 2020， 35（5）： 1240-1246.
	Li S L， Wei C P， Song Y H. Group decision making method for fuzzy complementary judgement matrices based on trust relationships［J］. Control and Decision， 2020， 35（5）： 1240-1246.
27	Blondel V D， Guillaume J， Lambiotte R， et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks［J］. Journal of Statistical Mechanics： Theory and Experiment， 2008， 2008（10）： 10008.
28	Dugué N， Perez A. Direction matters in complex networks： A theoretical and applied study for greedy modularity optimization［J］. Physica A： Statistical Mechanics and its Applications， 2022， 603： 127798.
29	Liu P D， Li Y Y， Wang P. Opinion dynamics and minimum adjustment-driven consensus model for multi-criteria large-scale group decision making under a novel social trust propagation mechanism［J］. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems， 2023， 31（1）： 307-321.
30	Yager R R， Rybalov A. Uninorm aggregation operators［J］. Fuzzy Sets and Systems， 1996， 80（1）： 111-120.
31	Zhang Z， Gao Y， Li Z L. Consensus reaching for social network group decision making by considering leadership and bounded confidence［J］. Knowledge-Based Systems， 2020， 204： 106240.
32	Li Y H， Kou G， Li G X， et al. Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2022， 303（2）： 790-802.

方法	信息表达形式	评价矩阵形式	子群划分方法	意见调整原则	策略操纵行为	退出行为	方案排序方法
文献[11]	图片模糊数	决策矩阵	COPRA	少数原则和外部专家的信任	——	基于信任关系的代理机制	拓展的MULTIMOORA
文献[10]	数值	加性偏好关系	COPRA	多数原则和外部专家的信任	——	基于偏好相似度的代理机制	最小偏差优先法
文献[21]	数值	模糊偏好关系	基于信任网络的子群发现算法	多数原则和意见领袖	基于意见领袖并排除操纵者	——	记分值
本文方法	不确定语言变量	决策矩阵	Louvain	多数原则和社交关系	基于行为类别调整权重	基于社交关系的代理机制	占优指数

方法	最终子群权重		子群共识度	群体共识度	备选方案评价值		备选方案排序
文献 [11]	G¹	0.3605	0.8379	0.8373	x₁	0.5006	x₂ > x₁ > x₃ > x₄
	G²	0.2431	0.8488		x₂	0.5022
	G³	0.3963	0.8332		x₃	0.4830
					x₄	0.4462	x₂ > x₁ > x₃ > x₄
文献 [10]	G¹	0.3243	0.8371	0.8377	x₁	0.4971
	G²	0.3115	0.8513		x₂	0.5050
	G³	0.3641	0.8322		x₃	0.4825
					x₄	0.4453	x₂ > x₃ > x₁ > x₄
文献 [21]	G¹	0.2736	0.8370	0.8444	x₁	0.4794
	G²	0.3682	0.8740		x₂	0.5159
	G³	0.3582	0.8197		x₃	0.4897
					x₄	0.4308
本文方法	G¹	0.2754	0.8370	0.8500	x₁	0.4848	x₂ > x₁ > x₃ > x₄
	G²	0.3677	0.8795		x₂	0.5202
	G³	0.3569	0.8298		x₃	0.4832
					x₄	0.4314

[1]	Xuanhua Xu,Ting Xiao,Xiaohong Chen. A consensus Model for Large-group Emergency Decision-making Based on Group Wisdomfusion under Social Network Environment [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(2): 285-297.
[2]	Lisheng Jiang,Huchang Liao. Risk-efficiency Mixed Consensus Model Considering Consensus Efficiency and Misjudgment Risk [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(2): 23-30.
[3]	Xun-jie GOU,Fu-min DENG,Ze-shui XU. The Application of the Large-scale Group Consensus Decision-making Method Based on Self-confident Double Hierarchy Linguistic Preference Relations [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(9): 222-232.
[4]	WENG Ke-rui, ZHOU Jing. Study on Updated Products Launch Timing and Seed Optimization under a Non-Delisting Strategy [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 226-234.
[5]	YAO Sheng-bao, GU Miao. A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making under the Influence of Empathy [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(11): 203-214.
[6]	JIN Feifei, LIU Jinpei, CHEN Huayou, DU Pengcheng. Social Network Group Decision-Making Model Based on Trust Relationship and Information Measures with Probabilistic Linguistic Information [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(10): 178-190.
[7]	WU Deng-sheng, LI Ruo-yun. The Structure and Evolution of Institution Collaboration Network on Management Sciences in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(9): 168-177.
[8]	LIU De-hai, WANG Wei-guo. Co-evolutionary Mechanism of Social Network Structure and Strategy in Mass Emergency with Maintain Legal Rights [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, (3): 185-192.

A Consensus Method for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Based on Behavior Management under Social Network Environments

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 32

Related Articles 8

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0