主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

The Alignment and the Entrenchment Effect Caused by Shareholders' Market Behavior

Expand
  • School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230000, China

Received date: 2012-04-18

  Revised date: 2013-04-07

  Online published: 2015-03-18

Abstract

Important shareholders' market behavior has received much attention from securities in theory and practice, because it has not only directly impact on stock prices, but also affect the company's growth, and which is in conflict with the interests of other investors. A-share listed companies which have buying or selling behavior as the sample are used in this paper, growth target is then created through principal component analysis, and multiple regression analysis model of Shareholders' buying or selling behavior and company's growth is constructed. The empirical research the catalysis of the Alignment and the Entrenchment Effect under the multi-factors' combined influence. The empirical result shows that: important shareholders' buying behavior will strengthen the alignment effect and their selling behavior will strengthen the entrenchment effect. What's more, the entrenchment effect is more obvious when the largest shareholders have more shareholding proportion, and the alignment effect is more obvious when the top ten shareholders hold more stock, which reflects the equilibrium relation between equity balance and equity controlling.

Cite this article

WANG Jian-wen, GUO Yan-ling, WANG Li-na, HAN Fei-fei . The Alignment and the Entrenchment Effect Caused by Shareholders' Market Behavior[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015 , 23(3) : 76 -81 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.009

References

[1] Grossman S J, Hart O D. One share-one vote and the market for corporate control[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20:175-202.

[2] Shleifer A, Vishny R W. A survey of corporate governance[J]. Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(2): 737-783.

[3] Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A. Corporate ownership around the world[J]. Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(2): 471-517.

[4] Claessens S, Djankov S, Lang L H P. The separation of ownership and control in east asian corporations[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58(1): 81-112.

[5] Hart O. Firms, contracts and financial structure [M].Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.

[6] 许永斌,郑金芳.中国民营上市公司家族控制权特征与公司绩效实证研究[J].会计研究,2007,(11):50-57.

[7] 吴淑琨. 股权结构与公司绩效的U型关系研究——1997~2000年上市公司的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2002,(1):80-87.

[8] 孔爱国,王淑庆.股权结构对公司业绩的影响——基于中国上市公司的实证分析[J].复旦学报,2003,(5):26-33.

[9] 徐莉萍,辛宇.股权集中度和股权制衡及其对公司经营绩效的影响[J].经济研究,2006,(1):90-100.

[10] 吴振信,张雪峰,王书平,等.受限股解禁的信号传递模型[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(S1):353-357.

[11] 刘银国,高莹,白文周.股权结构与公司绩效相关性研究[J].管理世界,2010,(9): 177-179.

[12] 徐向艺,张立达.上市公司股权结构与公司价值关系研究——一个分组检验的结果[J].中国工业经济,2008,241(4):102-109.

[13] Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure [J].Journal of Finacial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.

[14] Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny R W. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20(1/2): 293-315.

[15] Mcconnell J J, Servaes H. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1990, 27(2): 595-612.

[16] Mcconell J, Servaes H, Lins K. Changes in insider ownership and changes in the market value of the firm[J].Journal of Corporate Finance, 2008,14(2):431-445.

[17] 韩亮亮,李凯,宋力.高管持股与企业价值——基于利益趋同效应与壕沟防守效应的经验研究[J].南开管理评论,2006,9(4):35-41.

[18] 朱茶芬,陈超.信息优势、波动风险与大股东的选择性减持行为[J].浙江大学学报,2009,40(2):164-173.

[19] 陈小悦,徐晓东.股权结构、企业绩效与投资者利益保护[J].经济研究,2001,(11):3-11.

[20] 白重恩,刘俏.中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究[J].经济研究,2005,(2):81-91.

[21] Mansfield E. Entry, Gibran's law, innovation and the growth of firms [J].American Economic Review, 1962,52(2):1023-1030.

[22] 吕长江,金超,陈英.财务杠杆对公司成长性影响的实证研究[J].财经问题研究,2006,(2): 82-87.

[23] 党文娟,张宗益,吴俊.基于博弈论的均衡股权结构治理模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(3):164-172.
Outlines

/