主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Carbon Emission Reduction Cost-Sharing Model in Supply Chain Based on Improvingthe Demand for Low-Carbon Products

Expand
  • School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Received date: 2014-05-22

  Revised date: 2014-12-20

  Online published: 2015-07-22

Abstract

For the existence of carbon emission reduction cost, the retail price of the products is so high that the market demand is low, which restricts the promotion of low-carbon products. Our motivation comes from the fact that most consumers think that the price of low-carbon products is so high that they are not willing to buy. So, how to reduce the price of low-carbon products so that the demand can be improved has become an important issue in enterprise operation. On the background of a bilateral-monopoly supply chain consisting of a single manufacturer and a single retailer, Stackelberg models are established based on the carbon emission reduction cost-sharing contract. And the backward induction is regarded as an efficient method of solving the problem. We analyze how the order quantity, the profits of supply chain members and the whole supply chain are influenced by the carbon emission reduction cost-sharing contract within the supply chain. According to the research, when the carbon emission reduction cost -sharing contract is introduced into the model, it leads a good consequence that the optimal order quantity of the low-carbon product increases, the retail price decreases, and the manufacturer and the retailer will get Pareto improvement on certain condition. On the basis, a further analysis is carried on and a conclusion shows that consumers' awareness and emotional factors of low-carbon products have a positive effect on enterprise's order quantity and profit, while have a negative effect on the optimal cost-sharing rate shared by the manufacture. Our key contribution lies in modeling the cost-sharing contract to coordinate the relationship between the manufacturer and retailer. At the same time, the supply chain member can get Pareto improvement on certain condition.

Cite this article

ZHOU Yan-ju, HUANG Yu-qing, CHEN Xiao-hong, XU Xuan-hua . Carbon Emission Reduction Cost-Sharing Model in Supply Chain Based on Improvingthe Demand for Low-Carbon Products[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015 , 23(7) : 85 -93 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.07.011

References

[1] Woodley J. Reviewing the European Trade[J]. Public Utilities Fortnightly, 2007,(3): 25-29.

[2] Gajewski A, Siergiejuk J, Szulborski K. Carbon dioxide emission while heating in selected European countries[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2013, 65(10): 197-204.

[3] Wang T, Watson J. Scenario analysis of Chinas emissions pathways in the 21st century for low carbon transition[J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(7): 3537-3546.

[4] Vanclay J K, Shortiss J, Aulsebrook S, et al. Customer response to carbon labelling of groceries[J]. Journal of Consumer Policy, 2011, 34(1): 153-160.

[5] Suchard H T, Polonski M J. A theory of environmental buyer behaviour and its validity: the environmental action-behaviour model. Proceedings of AMA Summer Educators' Conference, Chicago, 1991, August.

[6] Kroes J, Subramanian R, Subramanyam R. Operational compliance levers, environmental performance, and firm performance under cap and trade regulation[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2012, 14(2): 186-201.

[7] Fraj E, Martinez E. Ecological consumer behaviour: An empirical analysis[J]. International Journal of Consumer Studies,2007, 31(1): 26-33.

[8] 汪兴东, 景奉杰. 城市居民低碳购买行为模型研究——基于五个城市的调研数据[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(2): 47-55.

[9] Zhao Huihui,Gao Qian, Wu Yaoping, et al. What affects green consumer behavior in China? A case study from Qingdao[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 63(2): 143-151.

[10] Benjaafar S, Li Yanzhi, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models.[J]. Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2013, 10(1): 99-116.

[11] Absi N, Dauzère-Pérès S, Kedad-Sidhoum S, et al. Lot sizing with carbon emission constraints[J], European Journal of Operational Research,2013, 227(1): 55-61.

[12] Hua Guowei, Cheng T C E, Wang Shouyang. Managing carbon footprints in inventory management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2011, 132(2): 178-185.

[13] Zhang Bin, Xu Liang. Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2013,144(1): 118-127.

[14] Du Shaofu, Ma Fang, Fu Zuoling, et al. Game-theoretic analysis for an emission-dependent supply chain in a ‘cap-and-trade’ system[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2015,228(1): 135-149.

[15] Liu Zugang, Anderson T D, Cruz J M. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 218(3): 602-613.

[16] 赵道致,原白云,徐春明.低碳供应链纵向合作减排的动态优化[J]. 控制与决策,2014,29(7):1340-1344.

[17] 王芹鹏,赵道致. 消费者低碳偏好下的供应链收益共享契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(9):114-122.

[18] 骆瑞玲, 范体军, 夏海洋. 碳排放交易政策下供应链碳减排技术投资的博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(11):44-53.

[19] 庞晶,李文东.低碳消费偏好与低碳产品需求分析[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2011,9(21):76-80.

[20] 杜少甫,董骏峰,梁樑,等.考虑排放许可与交易的生产优化[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(3):81-86.
Outlines

/