主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

R&D Project Dynamic Investment Decision-making Model Based on Real Option

Expand
  • School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Received date: 2013-11-04

  Revised date: 2014-09-07

  Online published: 2015-09-28

Abstract

Based on Baron's strategic CSR view, this paper considers a two-echelon supply chain consisting of an upstream manufacturer and a downstream retailer, and models three different CSR allocations by examining whether the manufacturer or the retailer is required to conduct CSR activities. Further, three-stage non-cooperative operations models are built corresponding to three different CSR allocations in the supply chain (the retailer alone is responsible for CSR activities, the manufacture alone is responsible for CSR activities, both are responsible for CSR activities)so as to identify the mutual incentive mechanism between supply chain members. The comparisons among the equilibrium economic and social performances under those three different CSR allocations show that under the condition that consumers positively respond to supply chain CSR activites, supply chain members' CSR choices are strategically complementary, leading to mutual incentives on their CSR behaviors, and due to this mutual incentive, the CSR allocation where both the manufacturer and the retailer are responsible for their own CSR activities reuslts in higher economic and social performance in equilibrium. Furthermore, A Nash bargaining model is used to describe cooperative CSR decision making and wholesale price contract negotiation. The corresponding Nash bargaining solution shows that since this cooperative operations can overcome the problem of double marginalization in the ex post product-transaction stage and the lack of CSR motivation (relative to the CSR motivations in centralized case)in the ex ante CSR strategic interaction stage (due to the strategic complementarity)under non-cooperative operations, the cooperation can further enhance both supply chain members' individual and the supply chain's social and economic performances(compared to the highest performance outcome under non-cooperative operations where both members are responsible). The main results obtained in both a non-cooperative and a cooperative settings are numerically illustrated. These results, on the one hand, provide a theoretical response to the debate on which member in a supply chain should be responsible for CSR activities, and on the other hand, point out that the focus in managing CSR interactions in a supply chain shall not be on how allocate CSR among supply chain members, but on whether to adopt a cooperative way to operate the supply chain.

Cite this article

NI De-bing, LI Xuan, TANG Xiao-wo . R&D Project Dynamic Investment Decision-making Model Based on Real Option[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015 , 23(9) : 97 -105 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.09.012

References

[1] Amaeshi K, Osuji O K, Nnodim P. Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 81(1): 223-234.

[2] Cater C R, Jennings M M. Social responsibility and supply chain relationships [J]. Transportation Research E, 2002, 38(1): 37-52.

[3] Chiou T, Chan H K, Lettice F, et al. The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan [J]. Transportation Research E, 2011, 47(6): 822-836.

[4] Freeman R E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach [M] Boston:Pitman/Ballinger, 1984.

[5] OECD. Extended producer responsibility: A guidance manual for governments [M].Paris:OECO, 2001.

[6] Friedman M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit [M]//Zimmerli W C,Holzinger M,Richte K.Corporote ethics and Corporate governance. New York:Springer,2007.

[7] Baron D P. Business and its environment [M]. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2006.

[8] Hsueh C F, Chang M S. Equilibrium analysis and corporate social responsibility for supply chain integration [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 190 (1): 116-129.

[9] Ni Debing, Li K, Tang Xiaowo. Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains: Insights from wholesale price contracts [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(3): 1269-1279.

[10] Savaskan C, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove L N. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing [J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(2): 239-252.

[11] Debo L, Toktay B, Van Wassenhove L N. Market segmentation and production technology selection for remanufacturable products [J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(8): 1193-1205.

[12] Majumder P, Groenevelt H. Competition in remanufacturing [J]. Production and Operations Management, 2001, 10(2): 125-141.

[13] Chen J, Chang C. The co-opetitive strategy of a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing [J]. Transportation Research E, 2011, 48(2): 387-400.

[14] 王玉燕,李帮义,申亮. 供应链、逆向供应链系统的定价策略模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2006, 14(4): 40-45.

[15] 王文宾,达庆利,聂锐. 考虑渠道权力结构的闭环供应链定价与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(5): 29-36.

[16] Sheu J. Bargaining framework for competitive green supply chains under governmental financial intervention [J]. Transportation Research E, 2011, 47(5): 573-592.

[17] Bae S H, Sarkis J, Yoo C S. Greening transportation fleets: Insight from a two-stage game theoretic mode [J].Transportation Research E, 2011, 47(6): 793-807.

[18] Muthoo A. Bargaining Theory with Applications [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

[19] Rotenberg J. Human relations in the workplace [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1994, 102(4): 684-717.

[20] Dur R, Sol J. Social interaction, co-worker altruism and incentives [J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2010, 69(2): 293-301.
Outlines

/