主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

A Study on the Supplier Selection Flexibility Based on Strategic Transfer Pricing Commitment

Expand
  • 1. School of Economics & Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;
    2. School of Journalism and Communication, Wuhan University, WUhan 430072, China

Received date: 2014-03-19

  Revised date: 2014-12-31

  Online published: 2016-02-25

Abstract

There are interactions between upstream strategic transfer pricing commitment and downstream innovation in a supplier-manufacturer channel, which strongly affect supply chain cooperation mode and the partners' behavior preferences. Based on routing flexibility and supply chain performance dimensions, say, committed delivery lead time, innovation investment, production quantity and profit, in this parer a strategic transfer pricing commitment model is formulated to provide a view of issues concerning supply chain cooperation mode, with combining the above mentioned static interactions and different flexibility levels into dynamic supply network configuration. By so doing, can at least five interactions be identified, say, i) FF Flexible transfer pricing, Flexible production quantity), ii]) CF(Committed transfer pricing, Flexible production quantity), iii) CO(Committed transfer pricing, Without delivery time uncertainty), iv) IW(Integrated supply chain, With delivery time uncertainty), v) IO(Integrated supply chain, Without delivery time uncertainty). With considering the supply chain routing flexibility and applying sample simulation analysis method, at least three conclusions can be obtained, I) Flexible supply network configuration is an important method for supply chain partners and supply chain as a whole to obtain performance improvement. Comparing with no flexibility, maximal and partial flexibility can help to improve performance, and maximal flexibility assumes the most priority in this process. II) Although partial flexibility is a feasible flexibility configuration, it arouses disequilibrium of network resources between supply and demand. III) Flexibility level and each partner's ability are two dominant dimensions to distinguish profit performance between integrated decision with uncertainty and transfer pricing commitment without uncertainty, and further influence the selection of supply chain cooperation mode and behavior preference. Sample simulation analysis in this paper, in which data is partly adopted and modified use for reference of the researches done by Cho and Gerchak[14] and Wadhwa et al.[4] helps to confirm the above deduction and provides a view for further research of the interactions that exist between optimal cooperation modes and behavior preferences.

Cite this article

FENG Hua, PANG Mei, LIU Kai-jun, WANG Tian-yu . A Study on the Supplier Selection Flexibility Based on Strategic Transfer Pricing Commitment[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016 , 24(2) : 38 -46 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.02.005

References

[1] Das K. Integrating effective flexibility measures into a strategic supply chain planning model[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 211, 201(1):170-183.

[2] Sánchez A M, Pérez M P. Supply chain flexibility and firm performance:A conceptual model and empirical study in the automotive industry[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2005,25(7):681-700.

[3] Lummus R, Duclos L, Vokurka R. Supply chain flexibility:Building a new model[J]. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2003,4(4):1-13.

[4] Wadhwa S, Saxena A, Chan F T S. Framework for flexibility in dynamic supply chain management[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2008,46(6):1373-1404.

[5] Gosling J, Purvis L, Naim M M. Supply chain flexibility as a determinant of supplier selection[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2010,128:11-21.

[6] Malhotra M K, Mackelprang A W. Are internal manufacturing and external supply chain flexibilities complementary capabilities?[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2012, 30:180-200.

[7] Moon K K, Yi C Y, Ngai E W T. An instrument for measuring supply cahin flexibility for the textile and clothing companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 222(2):191-203.

[8] Stalk G.Jr. Time-The next source of competitive advantage[J], Harvard Business Review, 1988,66(6):41-51

[9] Lee L, Lee Y S. Pricing and delivery-time performance in a competitive environment[J]. Management Science,1994, 5(40):633-646.

[10] 杨文胜,李莉. 响应时间不确定下的交货期相关定价研究[J].中国管理科学, 2005,13(2):56-62.

[11] 冯华,崔元锋,马士华. 战略性转移定价承诺策略与下游创新之间的交互影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006, 14(1):61-67.

[12] Karmarkar U. Manufacturing lead times, order release and capacity loading[M]//Graves S, Rinnooy Kan A, Zipkin P. Handbooks in operations research and management science:Logistics of production and inventory. Amsterdam:North-Holland, 1993:287-329.

[13] Porteus E L. Optimal pricing andreturns policies for perishable commodities[J]. Marketing Science,1985, 4(2):166-176.

[14] Cho K R, Gerchak Y. Supply chain coordination with downstream operating costs:Coordination and investment to improve downstream operating efficiency[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2005, 162:762-772.

[15] Palaka K, Erlebacher S, Kropp D H. Lead-time setting, capacity utilization, and pricing decisions under lead-time dependent demand[J]. ⅡE Transactions, 1998, 30(2):151-163.

[16] Radjou N.Deconstruction of supply China[J].Supply Chain Management Review,2000,4:30-38.
Outlines

/