In the process of project investment decision, investors face various risks. Some are project risks from the project itself. Some are background risks from exogenous uncertainty, such as interest rate risk, inflation risk,and so on. Based on the different effects that background risks have on the investment wealth, the background risks can be divided into additive background risks and multiplicative background risks. In practice, investors often face the two kinds of background risks as well as project risks. Besides, there often exist correlations between the background risks and project risks. The changes of the background risks will usually lead to corresponding changes of the project risks, which makes project investment decision become more complicated. Thus, it is necessary to study the problems of project investment decision considering the background risks and the correlations between the project risks and background risks.
According to the literature review, most studies on background risks focus on the impact of some kind of the background risks on the investor's risk attitude, risky asset allocation, and individual portfolio selection. The researches on project investment decision considering the background risks are limited, and those considering the additive and multiplicative background risks simultaneously are few. Therefore, a decision analysis method is proposed. In the method, project investment decision models are constructed considering the two kinds of background risks as well as project risk, and the effects of the correlations between the background risks and project risk on the investment decision are analyzed.
First of all, the project investment decision model is constructed, which considers the additive background risk and project risk and the correlations between them. In this case, the analytic solution of the optimal investment value can be obtained. When the correlation coefficient is in a certain range, there exists the optimal investment value which can maximize the certainty equivalent of the expected investment profit. Then, with respect to the situation of the multiplicative background risk, a project investment decision model is also constructed. By the simulation analysis of the model, it can be concluded that the optimal investment value exists, and the correlation coefficient between the multiplicative background risk and project risk has effect on investment decision.
Further, the investment decision model considering the two kinds of background risks is constructed. In the model, the correlation coefficients between the additive background risk and project risk and those between the multiplicative background risk and project risk are both considered. And, the monte carlo simulation is used to analyze the impacts of the correlations on investment decisions under different situations. On the basis of the analysis, the results can be obtained that there exists optimal investment value in any case. And, the influence of the correlations between the additive background risk and project risk on the investment decision is weakened. In addition, there are differences in the certainty equivalent and optimal investment value compared with the situation of the multiplicative background risk alone.
Finally, the research conclusions and limitations are summarized. Our study implies that different background risks and correlation coefficients can make the optimal investment value and investment profit different. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the two kinds of background risks and the correlations between them and the project risk in the process of the project investment decision. The research conclusions can also provide decision support for investors facing with the problem of project investment decision in practice.
ZHANG Yao, GUAN Xin, SUN Yang, ZUO Fei
. Project Investment Decision Considering Background Risks[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016
, 24(9)
: 71
-80
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.09.009
[1] 谷晓燕. 基于实物期权的研发项目动态投资决策模型 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 28(7): 94-102.
[2] 李战江, 迟国泰, 党均章. 基于copula的追随者银行的企业项目总体风险评价模型 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(1): 99-110.
[3] Schlesinger H. Insurance demand without the expected-utility paradigm [J]. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1997, 64(1): 19-39.
[4] Kihlstrom R E, Romer D, Williams S. Risk aversion with random initial wealth [J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1981, 49(4): 911-920.
[5] Campbell J Y, Viceira L M. Who should buy long-term bonds [J]. American Economic Review, 2001,19(1): 199-227.
[6] Doherty N A, Schlesinger H. Optimal insurance in incomplete markets [J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1983, 91(6): 1045-1054.
[7] Bell D E. A contextual uncertainty condition for behavior under risk [J]. Management Science, 1995, 41(7): 1145-1150.
[8] 卞世博, 刘海龙. 背景风险下DC型养老基金的最优投资策略——基于Legendre转换对偶解法 [J]. 管理工程学报, 2013, 27(3): 144-149.
[9] 李婷, 张卫国, 徐维军. 考虑背景风险因素的模糊投资组合选择模型 [J]. 系统工程, 2012, 30(12): 33-38.
[10] Baptista A M. Portfolio selection with mental accounts and background risk [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2012, 36(4): 968-980.
[11] 吴卫星, 沈涛, 董俊华,等. 投资期限与居民家庭股票市场参与——基于微观调查数据的实证分析 [J]. 国际金融研究, 2014,(12): 68-76.
[12] Ross S A. Some stronger measures of risk aversion in the small and in the large with applications [J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1981, 49(3): 621-638.
[13] Nachman D C. Preservation of "more risk averse" under expectations [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1982, 28(2): 361-368.
[14] Pratt J W, Zeckhauser R J. Proper risk aversion [J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1987, 55(1): 143-154.
[15] Pratt J W. Aversion to one risk in the presence of others [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1988, 1(4): 396-413.
[16] Kimball M S. Precautionary savings in the small and in the large [J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1990, 58(1): 53-73.
[17] Kimball M S. Standard risk aversion [J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1993, 61(3): 589-611.
[18] Gollier C, Pratt J W. Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk [J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1996, 64(5): 1109-1123.
[19] Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C, Schlesinger H. Changes in background risk and risk taking behavior [J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1996, 64(3): 683-689.
[20] Finkelshtain I, Kella O, Scarsini M. On risk aversion with two risks [J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1999, 31(2): 239-250.
[21] Keenan D C, Rudow D C, Snow A. Risk preferences and changes in background risk [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2008, 36(2): 139-152.
[22] Brennan M J, Xia Yihong. Dynamic asset allocation under inflation [J]. Finance, 2002, 57(3): 1201-1238.
[23] Li J. The demand for a risky asset in the presence of a background risk [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2011, 146(1): 372-391.
[24] Franke G, Schlesinger H, Stapleton R C. Multiplicative background risk [J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1): 146-153.
[25] Jokung O. Changes in multiplicative background risk and risk-taking behavior [J]. Theory and Decision, 2013, 74(1): 127-149.
[26] Franke G, Schlesinger H, Stapleton R C. Risk taking with additive and multiplicative background risks [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2011, 146(4): 1547-1568.
[27] Huang H H,Wang C P. Portfolio selection and portfolio frontier with background risk [J]. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2013, 26:177-196.
[28] Tsetlin I, Winkler R L. Risky choices and correlated background risk [J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(9): 1336-1345.
[29] Lin Wenchang, Lu J. Risky asset allocation and consumption rule in the presence of background risk and insurance markets [J]. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2012, 50(1): 150-158.