主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

The Model Choice and Design of Credit Assets Securitization

Expand
  • 1. School of Finance and statistics, HunanUniversity, Changsha 410079, China;
    2. School of Mathematic and statistics, Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China;
    3. Department of Finance, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen 518055, China

Received date: 2016-02-24

  Revised date: 2016-06-27

  Online published: 2017-03-07

Abstract

It is believed that asset securitization is the root cause of the recent financial crisis. But it is one of the main financing instruments to obtain cheap capital from the capital market because it has merits such as transforming illiquid assets into marketable securities and diversifying risk. China International Capital Corporation Limited forecasts that asset securitization will increase over 40 percent a year on average during next 5 years in China.In addition to its importance as a financial and asset restructuring tool, securitization originates various streams of academic research. But some important questions remain unexplained. The established models don't address why the firm should securitize its assets. They don't investigate wether securitization can be a viable alternative for the firm when it chooses its optimal corporate structure. A model of the multi-asset firm which provides an answer to these questions is developed. The model analyzes various corporate structures and validates asset securitization as one of the value maximizing options which can accomplish the optimal incorporation of the assets in the firm. In the framework of the model, the multi-asset firm can optimally choose between aggregating all the assets in one firm, securitizing a part of them through a securitization vehicle, or spinning them off into single-asset firms. These problems belong to the hot and cutting-edge research fields in finance. They are innovative and interesting in application for the practice of the asset securitization.Using corporate security pricing theory, explicit solutions for valuating all contingent claims are provided under the assumption that the cash flow of bank assets follows an arithmetic Brownian motion. An commercial bank is taken as an example, the motivation of commercial bank asset securitization and the optimal issuing method are given. Numerical analysis shows that:Asset securitization can revitalize the capital, and can improve the value of assets; the securitization lever decreases with the correlation coefficient. Finally, some advice is provided to our country commercial Banks asset securitization method.

Cite this article

ZHANG Yong, YANG Zhao-jun, LUO Peng-fei . The Model Choice and Design of Credit Assets Securitization[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016 , 24(12) : 1 -9 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.12.001

References

[1] Riddiough T J. Optimal design and governance of asset-backed securities[J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 1997, 6(2): 121-152.

[2] Affinito M, Tagliaferri E. Why do (or did?) banks securitize their loans? Evidence from Italy[J]. Journal of Financial Stability, 2010, 6(4): 189-202.

[3] Cardone-Riportella C, Samaniego-Medina R, Trujillo-Ponce A. What drives bank securitisation? The Spanish experience[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2010, 34(11): 2639-2651.

[4] Elul R. The economics of asset securitization[J]. Business Review, 2005,Q3:16-25.

[5] Boot A, Thakor A. Security design[J]. Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(4): 1349-78.

[6] DeMarzo P, Duffie D. A liquidity‐based model of security design[J]. Econometrica, 1999, 67(1): 65-99.

[7] DeMarzo P M. The pooling and tranching of securities: A model of informed intermediation[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2005, 18(1): 1-35.

[8] Hennessy C. A theory of ABS design based on rational noise-traders[R]. Working Paper, London Business School, 2013.

[9] 郭桂霞, 王勇. 不确定流动性需求与银行资产证券化最优规模[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2012, 7: 001.

[10] 郭桂霞,巫和懋,魏旭,等. 银行资产证券化的风险自留监管: 作用机制和福利效果[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2014,13(3):887-916.

[11] 林敏华. 信贷资产证券化, 异质性投资者和金融风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6): 25-31.

[12] 赵志明, 杨招军, 王淼. 基于或有可转换证券的投资和融资决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016,124(7): 18-26.

[13] 宿成建. 现金流信息, 现金流风险与股票收益定价研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2016,19(5): 102-113,126.

[14] Hartman-Glaser B, Piskorski T, Tchistyi A. Optimal securitization with moral hazard[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 104(1): 186-202.

[15] Leland H E, Pyle D H. Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation[J]. Journal of Finance, 1977,32(2):371-87.

[16] Hill C A. Securitization: A low-cost sweetener for lemons[J]. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,2005,10(1):64-71.

[17] 马本江, 姜云芳, 陈晓红. 存在应收账款条件下中小企业不足额质押融资合同设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(12): 35-44.

[18] 熊熊, 姚传伟, 张永杰. 中小企业联合担保贷款的计算实验金融分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(3): 88-94.

[19] 徐朝辉, 周宗放. 内部控制、过度投资与公司信用风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016,24(9): 21-27.

[20] Merton R C. On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1974, 29(2): 449-470.

[21] Leland H E. Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1994, 49(4): 1213-1252.

[22] Skarabot J. Asset securitization and optimal asset structure of the firm[R]. prepared for EFMA, 2001.

[23] Leland H E, Toft K B. Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure of credit spreads[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1996, 51(3): 987-1019.
Outlines

/