Green development has emerged in various fields and one of the most fundamental fields goes back to green agriculture. Under the influence of carbon emission which has become increasingly serious, the development of forestry carbon sequestration eases the pressure on corporate emissions. And it also brings the new gain points to forestry investors. The traditional evaluation of forestry investment project only considers the wood cutting benefits, which has been undervalued.
In order to assess the value of forestry investment projects with carbon sequestration benefits, the benefits of carbon sequestration are taken as endogenous variables into the classic faustmann model. On the basis of calculating the net present value of traditional wood(NPVw), it adds the net present value of carbon (NPVc). The land expectation value(LEV) of forest within the investment period is calculated by building timber-carbon sequestration joint management decision-making model, which is regarded as theinitial value of forestry projects. And the basic idea of compound real option is adopted, the expansion option, contracting option and abandonment option are introduced in the process of investment and the method of stochastic dynamic programming is selected to solve the maximize market value of the investment project. It is assumed that the deadline of project is 20 years and the period is divided into four stages. On the other hand, it is assumed that the value of project increases ɑ times after executing the expansion option and decreases β times after executing the contracting option. The binary tree option method is combined to analyze the portfolio and strategy problems of forestry projects. So that the compound real option pricing of the carbon sequestration benefits attached forestry investment projects can be implemented.Take a project of carbon sink afforestation in Zixing city in Hunan province as an example. The Chinese fir is selected for analyzing, and the time of project is from 2008 to 2027. There is non forest land before investment, with a total area of 2,665.3 hectares. The results show that the forestry value with carbon sequestration benefits is greater than traditional value. In the absence of carbon sinks trade, the net income present value of timber within 20 years is 172 million Chinese yuan, but it increases to 191 million Chinese yuan when existing the benefit of carbon sink. And the value of project eventually can increase to 329 million Chinese yuan after the introducing real option, which means to implement the option value as high as 138 million Chinese yuan.Therefor the value will increase significantly when we use the compound real option to assess the value of forestry investment projects. By further analysis, it is found that the price fluctuation of carbon sink and wood positively correlated with the value of forestry project. And once the other conditions is stable, the higher investment cost is, the lower option value will be.
HE Xiao-bo, WANG Dong-mei, ZENG Shi-hong
. Valuation for Forestry Investment Projects with Carbon Sequestration Benefits——Based on Real Option Pricing Theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017
, 25(3)
: 39
-48
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.03.005
[1] 宋晓梅,田海龙,秦涛. 考虑碳成本与收益的森林和林地资源实物期权定价理论研究[J]. 科技管理研究,2014,34(16):200-204.
[2] Myers S C, Turnbull S M. Capital budgeting and the capital asset pricing model:Good news and bad news[J]. The Journal of Finance,1977,32(2):321-333.
[3] Brennan M J, Schwartz E S. Evaluation natural resource investments[J]. Journal of Business,1985,58(2):135-149.
[4] Duku-Kaakyire A, Nanang D M. Application of real options theory to forestry investment analysis[J].Forest Policy and Economics, 2004, 6(6):539-552.
[5] Stainback G A,Alavalapati J R R. Economic analysis of slash pine forest carbon sequestration in the sourthern U.S[J].Journal of Forest Economics,2002,8(2):105-117.
[6] Benitez P,McCallum I,Obersteiner M,et al. Global supply for carbon sequestration:Identifying least-cost afforestation sites under country risk consideration[R].Interim Report, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria,2004.
[7] Olschewski R, Benitez P C.Optimizing joint production of timber and carbon sequestration of afforestation projects[J].Journal of Forest Economics,2010,16(1):1-10.
[8] Pajot G.Rewarding carbon sequestration in South-Western French forests:A costly operation?[J].Journal of Forest Economics,2011,17 (4):363-377.
[9] K thke M, Dieter M. Effects of carbon sequestration rewards on forest management-An empirical application of adjusted Faustmann Formulae[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2010,12(8):589-597.
[10] Manley B.How does real option value compare with Faustmann value in the context of the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme?[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2013,30:14-22.
[11] Regan C M. Bryan B A. Real options analysis for land use management:Methods, applic-ation, and implications for policy[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 161:144-152.
[12] 谷晓燕,何锋,蔡晨. 风险条件下基于实物期权的研发项目多阶段评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2011,19(4):68-75.
[13] 刘洪儒,吴树斌,马洁. 实物期权理论在投资决策中的应用探析[J]. 现代管理科学,2013,(11):18-20.
[14] 谷晓燕.基于实物期权的研发项目动态投资决策模型[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(7);94-102.
[15] 林伯强,李江龙. 基于随机动态递归的中国可再生能源政策量化评价[J]. 经济究,2014,49(4):89-103.
[16] 黄杉琴,张绍文. 林业项目投资决策中的复合实物期权方法分析[J]. 企业经济,2013,(4):173-177.
[17] 何沐文,刘金兰. 基于多重复合实物期权的自然资源开发投资评价模型[J]. 系统工程,2011,29(2):44-49.
[18] 沈月琴,王小玲,王枫,等. 农户经营杉木林的碳汇供给及其影响因素[J]. 中国人口.资源与环境,2013,23(8):42-47.
[19] 周伟,高岚. 森林碳汇收益的实证分析——以广东省杉木林为例[J]. 科技管理研究,2015,35(2):219-223.
[20] 朱臻,沈月琴,白江迪. 南方集体林区林农的风险态度与碳汇供给决策:一个来自浙江的风险偏好实验[J]. 中国软科学,2015,(7):148-157.
[21] 袁立嘉,唐玉凤,伍格致.湖南省桑植县林农经营碳汇林业意愿的实证研究[J]. 经济地理,2016, 36(4):149-154.
[22] 扈文秀,甄士民,樊宏社. 平行复合实物期权的定价研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2006,(11):26-115.
[23] 苏立娟,张谱,何友均. 森林经营综合效益评价方法与发展趋势[J]. 世界林业研究,2015,28(06):6-11.
[24] Ecosystem Marketplace. Forest carbon in 2015:Market experts make their new year's predictions[EB/OL].[2015-01-09]http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/articles/forest-carbon-2015-market-experts-make-new-years-predictions/
[25] 李献策.风险投资实物期权价值影响因素的灰色关联分析[J].统计与决策,2009,(15):59-60.