主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

How to Generate Cooperative Performance through Inter-organizational Information Systems Capabilities

Expand
  • 1. School of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

Received date: 2015-02-07

  Revised date: 2016-01-07

  Online published: 2017-08-26

Abstract

The emerging business networks bring opportunities and challenges to the applications of inter-organizational information systems (IOS). To reveal the mechanism of how IOS generate cooperative performance in the network embedded environment, the theoretical model is built from the IT process perspective to leverage IOS capabilities and inter-firm process ambidexterity through network embedded level. Survey data are collected from 213 manufacturing firms in China. According to the hierarchical regression analysis result, it is found that inter-firm processes alignment and flexibility positively interact to impact on the cooperative performance, while IOS integration capabilities and IOS reconfiguration capabilities have positive correlation with inter-firm process ambidexterity respectively. In contrast to previous research, it is found that network embeddedness has negative moderation effects, high level of network embeddedness will undermine the effect of IOS capabilities on inter-firm process, which shows the paradox of embeddedness. Our findings deepen and expand the framework of IT business value in information systems field, and provide inspiration and guidance for network practices of applying IOS to create value.

Cite this article

ZHU Shu-ting, ZHONG Wei-jun, MEI Shu-e . How to Generate Cooperative Performance through Inter-organizational Information Systems Capabilities[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017 , 25(5) : 61 -69 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.05.008

References

[1] Grover V, Kohli R. Cocreating IT value:New capabilities and metrics for multifirm environments[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2012, 36(1):225-232.
[2] 冯芷艳, 郭迅华, 曾大军,等. 大数据背景下商务管理研究若干前沿课题[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(1):1-9.
[3] 吴金南,仲伟俊. 电子商务能力影响供应链绩效的机理研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(1):142-149.
[4] Soh C, Markus M L. How IT creates business value:A process theory synthesis[C]//Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems, 1995:29-41.
[5] Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V. Review:Information technology and organizational performance:An integrative model of IT business value[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2004, 28(2):283-322.
[6] Kohli R, Grover V. Business value of IT:An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2008, 9(1):23-39.
[7] Pavlou P A, El Sawy O A. From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments:The case of new product development[J]. Information Systems Research, 2006, 17(3):198-227.
[8] Saraf N, Langdon C S, Gosain S. IS application capabilities and relational value in interfirm partnerships[J]. Information Systems Research,2007, 18(3):320-339.
[9] Rai A, Tang Xinling. Leveraging IT capabilities and competitive process capabilities for the management of interorganizational relationship portfolios[J]. Information Systems Research,2010, 21(3):516-542.
[10] Davenport T H, Short J E. The new industrial engineering:Information technology and business process redesign[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1990, 31(4):11-27.
[11] 朱镇, 张伟. IT能力如何提高供应链的竞争优势:整合与敏捷协调视角的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(S1):604-609.
[12] Gibson C B, Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(2):209-226.
[13] Xue Ling, Ray G, Sambamurthy V. Efficiency or innovation:How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms' IT asset portfolios?[J]. MIS Quarterly,2012, 36(2):509-528.
[14] Pavlou P A, El Sawy O A. Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities[J]. Decision Sciences, 2011, 42(1):239-273.
[15] Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances:Building relational capital[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3):217-237
[16] Sun Yongqiang, Fang Yulin, Lim K H, et al.User satisfaction with information technology service delivery:A social capital perspective[J]. Information Systems Research, 2012, 23(4):1195-1211.
[17] Leana C R, Van Buren H J. Organizational social capital and employment practices[J].Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(3):538-555.
[18] Braunscheidel M J, Suresh N C. The organizational antecedents of a firm's supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2009, 27(2):119-140.
[19] Bagozzi R P, Yi Y, Phillips L W. Assessing construct validity in organizational research[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991,36(3):421-458.
[20] 申笑宇, 黄河, 徐鸿雁. 制造商流程改进与采购合同联合优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(5):161-167.
[21] Zhu K, Kraemer K L, Xu S. The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries:A technology diffusion perspective on e-business[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(10):1557-1576.
[22] Kumar K, Van Dissel H G. Sustainable collaboration:Managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1996, 20(3):279-300.
[23] Chatfield A T, Yetton P. Strategic payoff from EDI as a function of EDI embeddedness[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems,2000, 16(4):195-224.
[24] Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks:The paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997,42(1):35-67.
Outlines

/