With increasing awareness of the environment, how to reduce carbon emissions and improve business performance has become a new concern in the field of supply chain management. To respond to this recognition, the objective of this paper is to address the issue as to how supply chain members coordinate the production, order and emission reduction strategy in the cap-and-trade mechanism, and that improve supply chain performance by means of cost-sharing contracts. In order to solve the problem, a two-tier supply chain with a manufacturer and a supplier is considered. An EOQ model is used to analyze decision making between supply chain members. Differing from previous studies which consider single factor only, two factors, production and transportation,are taken into account. From this starting point, a Stackelberg game model is built up to investigate the optimal carbon reduction strategy and cost-sharing contracts. The research results indicate that supply chain members can coordinate against a cost-sharing contract inclusive of carbon emission reductions. Joint decision making can help to reduce carbon emissions and improve supply chain performance. According to the study, the application of cost-sharing contracts is subject to the emission reduction technology of suppliers and the carbon attribute of products. The suppliers equipped with high quality technology for carbon emission reduction and low-carbon products would have more choices for cost-sharing contracts. The research is not only conducive to supply chain members making decisions to reduce carbon emissions, but also instrumental to the government for making policies pertaining to carbon emission reduction in the cap-and-trade mechanism.
ZHI Bang-dong, CHEN Jun-lin, LIU Xiao-hong
. The Coordination Strategy for Two-tier Supply Chains with a Cost-sharing Contract in the Cap-and-Trade Mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017
, 25(7)
: 48
-56
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.07.006
[1] Cordero P.Carbon footprint estimation for a sustainable improvement of supply chains: State of the art [J].Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management,2013,6(3):805-813.
[2] Cachon G P. Supply chain coordination with contracts[M]. Amsterdam: North Holland, 2003.
[3] 鲁力,陈旭.不同碳排放政策下基于回购合同的供应链协调策略[J].控制与决策,2014, 29(12):2212-2220.
[4] 赵道致,原白云,徐春秋.考虑产品碳排放约束的供应链协调机制研究[J]. 预测,2014, 33(5):76-80.
[5] 王芹鹏,赵道致.消费者低碳偏好下的供应链收益共享契约研究[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(9):114-122.
[6] 朱庆华,阎洪.绿色供应链管理:理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.
[7] 赵正佳. 考虑汇率变化和运输成本分担的跨国供应链数量折扣契约. 管理学报, 2012(06):913-919.
[8] 何勇,吴清烈,杨德礼. 基于努力成本共担的数量柔性契约模型. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2006,36(6): 1045-1048.
[9] Du Shaofu, Zhu Lili, Liang Liang, et al. Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the'cap-and-trade' system [J]. Energy policy,2013, 57:61-67.
[10] Jaber M Y, Glock C H, Saadany A M A E. Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives [J].International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 51(1): 69-82.
[11] 骆瑞玲,范体军,夏海洋.碳排放交易政策下供应链碳减排技术投资的博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(9):44-53.
[12] 周艳菊,黄雨晴,陈晓红.促进低碳产品需求的供应链减排成本分担模型[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(7):85-93.
[13] 黄帝,陈剑,周泓. 配额-交易机制下动态批量生产和减排投资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2016,24(4):129-137.
[14] 李友东,谢鑫鹏,营刚.两种分成契约下供应链企业合作减排决策机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(3):61-70.
[15] 杨玉香,吴增源,黄祖庆.考虑技术投资的供应链网络下不可交易污染排放许可均衡问题[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(4):74-82.
[16] International Energy Agency.Transport energy efficiency,2010[EB/OL]. http://www.iea.org/papers/2010/transport_energy_efficiency.pdf.
[17] Palak G, Ek?io?lu D S, Geunes G.Analyzing the impacts of carbon regulatory mechanisms on supplier and mode selection decisions: An application to a biofuel supply chain [J].International Journal of Production Economics,2014,154:198-216.
[18] Theiben S, Spinler S, Whu A H.Reducing the carbon footprint within fast-moving consumer goods supply chains through collaboration:The manufacturer Perspective [J].Journal of Supply Chain Management,2014,50(4):44-60.
