The trend of consumers' low-carbon consumption and the promulgation and implementation of the government carbon emission policies compel the company to inspect carbon emission of their own production and operations. The effects of government price subsidy, one-time subsidy and carbon tax on the decision-making of low-carbon supply chain under the single and dual sale modes are studied in this paper. A low-carbon supply chain centralized decision-making model with one producer and one retailer is built. On the basis of base model and decision models of three policies, the impacts of each policy on pricing and supply chain profit are explored analytically. The results show that given the same emission reduction degree, the product price subsidy under dual sale mode is greater than that of single sale mode. From the perspective of government, for single sale mode, the company should choose one-time subsidy policy to achieve the same emission reduction effect, while dual sale mode should implement the price subsidy policy. Carbon tax can improve emission reduction boundary to promote much more companies to reduce emission. Emission reduction boundary of single sale model is still higher than that of dual sale mode. Government should make a reasonable carbon tax, otherwise the company will not be willing to reduce emission or withdraw from the market. Additionally, the effects of emission reduction on pricing and supply chain profit as well as the influence of three policies' parameters on supply chain profit have been simulated, and some managerial implications have been revealed. The conclusions of this paper can provide theoretical foundation for the government to formulate low-carbon policy.
CAO Bin-bin, XIAO Zhong-dong, ZHU Chun-yang
. Research on Decision-making of Supply Chain with Dual Sale Mode Considering Government's Low-carbon Policies[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018
, 26(4)
: 30
-40
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.04.004
[1] Resnier M, Wang Can, Du Pengfei, et al. The promotion of sustainable development in China through the optimization of a tax/subsidy plan among HFC and power generation CDM projects[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(9):4529-4544.
[2] Toshimitsu T. On the paradoxical case of a consumer-based environmental subsidy policy[J]. Economic Modeling, 2010, 27(1):159-164.
[3] Hong J, Koo, Y, Jeong G, et al. Ex-ante evaluation of profitability and government's subsidy policy on vehicle-to-grid system[J]. Energy Policy, 2012, 42:95-104.
[4] 朱庆华, 窦一杰. 基于政府补贴分析的绿色供应链管理博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6):86-95.
[5] Sheu J B, Chen Y J. Impact of government financial intervention on competition among green supply chains[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 138(1):201-213.
[6] Letmathe P, Balakrishnan N. Environmental considerations on the optimal product mix[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 167(2):398-412.
[7] Anand K S, Carrier F G.Pollution regulation:An operations perspective[R].Working Paper, University of Utah, 2015.
[8] Benjaafar S, Li Yanzhi, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains:Insights from simple models[J]. IEEE Trans on Automation Science and Engineering, 2013, 10(1):99-116.
[9] Jaber M Y, Glock C H, Saadany A. Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 51(1):69-82.
[10] 谢鑫鹏,赵道致.低碳供应链生产及交易决策机制[J].控制与决策,2014,29(4):651-658.
[11] He Ping, Zhang Wei, Xu Xiaoyan, et al. Production lot-sizing and carbon emissions under cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 103:241-248.
[12] 支帮东, 陈俊霖, 刘晓红. 碳限额与交易机制下基于成本共担契约的两级供应链协调策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7):48-56.
[13] 李剑, 苏秦. 考虑运输过程的供应链减排模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(2):78-86.
[14] 刘超, 慕静. 碳排放政策不同和碳敏感度差异对于供应链的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 9(9):178-187.
[15] Yohe G W, Michael E S. Sea-level change:The expected economic cost of protection or abandonment in the United States[J]. Climatic Change, 1998, 38:447-472.
[16] Yue Jinfeng, Austin J, Wang M C, et al. Coordination of cooperative advertising in a two-level supply chain when manufacture offers discount[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 168(1):65-85.
