主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Emission Trading Auction Mechanism Design Based on Bilateral Abatement Cost Information Asymmetry

Expand
  • Management School of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Received date: 2016-12-28

  Revised date: 2017-08-22

  Online published: 2018-10-22

Abstract

Using auction to distribute pollution permits can not only internalize exterior problem of environmental pollution, but also adjust the contorted market price. A bilateral cost information asymmetry auction model is built to study the optimal auction mechanism, and the influence of related parameters on the optimal auction mechanism is further discussed. The results show that, the optimal auction mechanism is mixed auction mechanism. When the risk appetite exceeds a certain threshold, the hidden demand effectdominates, as the risk appetite increases, revenue and price volatility increase; when the risk appetite is smaller than a certain threshold, the competition effect dominates, as the risk appetite decreases, revenue and price volatility decrease. When the number of participants is small, hidden demand effect dominates, as the price impact coefficient increases, revenue increase under mixed auction; when the number of participants is large, competition effect dominates, as the price impact coefficient increases, revenue under mixed auctionpresent the inverted U type. As the price impact coefficient increases, the price volatility under mixed auction presents the inverted U type. Theoretical guidance is proviede for emissionpermits auction mechanism design.

Cite this article

YANG Jing-yu, LI Dong-dong . Emission Trading Auction Mechanism Design Based on Bilateral Abatement Cost Information Asymmetry[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018 , 26(8) : 146 -153 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.08.015

References

[1] 陈德湖.基于一级密封拍卖的排污权交易博弈模型[J].工业工程,2006,9(3):49-51.

[2] 顾孟迪,张敬一,李寿德.基于佣金约束的排污权拍卖机制[J].系统管理学报, 2008,17(2):173-176.

[3] 王先甲,黄彬彬,胡振鹏,等.排污权交易市场中具有激励相容性的双边拍卖机制[J].中国环境科学, 2010, 30(6):845-851.

[4] Wilson R. Auctions of share[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1979, 93(4):675-689.

[5] Back K, Zender J. Auctions of divisible goods:On the rationale for the treasury experiment[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1993, 6(4):733-764.

[6] Lengwiler Y.The multiple unit auction with variable supply[J].Economic Theory, 1999, 14(2):373-392.

[7] Back K,Zender J.Auctions of divisible goods with endogenous supply[J].Economics Letters, 2001, 73(1):29-34.

[8] Damianov D.The uniform price auction with endogenous supply[J]. Economics Letters, 2005, 88(2):152-158.

[9] McAdams D. Adjustable supply in uniform price auctions:Non-commitment as a strategic tool[J]. Economics Letters, 2007, 95(1):48-53.

[10] Ausubel L,Baranov O.Market design and the evolution of the combinatorial clock auction[J].American Economic Review, 2014, 104(5):446-451.

[11] Abbink K, Brandts J, Pezanis-Christou P.The Spanish auction for government securities:A laboratory analysis[R].Working Paper, UFAE and IAE, 2002.

[12] 奚君羊,马永波.三种国债拍卖方式的拍卖收入比较研究[J].财经研究, 2006, 32(12):65-74.

[13] 卢允照,刘树林.信息不对称下可分公共物品的拍卖研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(3):141-148.

[14] 郑君君,王向民,朱德胜,等.考虑学习速度的小世界网络上排污权拍卖策略演化[J].中国管理科学, 2017,25(3):76-84.

[15] Milgrom P,Weber R.A theory of auctions and competetive bidding[J].Econometrica,1982, 50(5):1089-1122.

[16] Cason T,Friedman D.Price formation in double auction markets[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 1996, 20(8):1307-1337.
Outlines

/